Skip to content

Post-processing Methods to Improve Strength of Particle-Bed 3D Printed Geopolymer for Digital Construction Applications (2019-07)

10.3389/fmats.2019.00160

 Nematollahi Behzad,  Xia Ming,  Sanjayan Jay
Journal Article - Frontiers in Materials, Vol. 6

Abstract

The strength of powder-based 3D printed geopolymer samples immediately after the de-powdering process (“green” strength) is inherently very low. Therefore, different post-processing techniques have been explored in the previous study of the authors to enhance the “green” strength of the printed geopolymer. The highest strength of around 30 MPa was achieved for the printed slag-based geopolymer sample cured in an alkaline solution for 7 days at 60°C. Although this strength is sufficient for a wide range of construction applications, the necessity for the heat curing procedure, which requires a significant amount of energy, can compromise the sustainability credentials of the developed powder-based 3D printed geopolymer and limit its commercial viability and large-scale applications in the construction industry. To tackle this issue, this study aims to develop a new post-processing method which eliminates the necessity for the heat curing. The influences of type of curing medium, duration and temperature of curing, and testing direction on the compressive strength of the printed geopolymer were investigated. The “green” printed geopolymer samples were immersed in four different curing mediums, including two sodium (Na)-based, and two potassium (K)-based activators with different alkali modulus (SiO2/M2O where M = Na or K), and cured at two different curing temperatures (ambient temperature (23°C) vs. 60°C) for 7 and 28 days. The compressive strength of the “post-processed” printed geopolymer specimens was measured in two different testing directions, namely the binder jetting direction and layer stacking direction. The results showed that the 28-day compressive strength of the ambient temperature cured printed geopolymer sample was comparable to the 7-day compressive strength of the corresponding heat cured sample. Therefore, the feasibility of enhancing the strength of printed geopolymer by curing in an alkaline solution at ambient temperature was established. This developed post-processing method based on the ambient temperature curing is more viable and less energy-intensive, yet provides comparable strength, as compared to the previously developed post-processing method based on the heat curing. The results also showed that the strength of the printed geopolymer samples cured in the K-based activators was lower than that of the specimens cured in the Na-based activators.

16 References

  1. Biernacki Joseph, Bullard Jeffrey, Sant Gaurav, Banthia Nemkumar et al. (2017-04)
    Cements in the 21st Century:
    Challenges, Perspectives, and Opportunities
  2. Cesaretti Giovanni, Dini Enrico, Kestelier Xavier, Colla Valentina et al. (2013-08)
    Building Components for an Outpost on the Lunar Soil by Means of a Novel 3D Printing Technology
  3. Gibbons Gregory, Williams Reuben, Purnell Phil, Farahi Elham (2013-07)
    3D Printing of Cement Composites
  4. Khoshnevis Behrokh (2003-11)
    Automated Construction by Contour Crafting:
    Related Robotics and Information Technologies
  5. Le Thanh, Austin Simon, Lim Sungwoo, Buswell Richard et al. (2012-01)
    Hardened Properties of High-Performance Printing Concrete
  6. Le Thanh, Austin Simon, Lim Sungwoo, Buswell Richard et al. (2012-01)
    Mix-Design and Fresh Properties for High-Performance Printing Concrete
  7. Lloret-Fritschi Ena, Shahab Amir, Linus Mettler, Flatt Robert et al. (2014-03)
    Complex Concrete Structures:
    Merging Existing Casting Techniques with Digital Fabrication
  8. Lowke Dirk, Dini Enrico, Perrot Arnaud, Weger Daniel et al. (2018-07)
    Particle-Bed 3D Printing in Concrete Construction:
    Possibilities and Challenges
  9. Marchon Delphine, Kawashima Shiho, Bessaies-Bey Hela, Mantellato Sara et al. (2018-05)
    Hydration- and Rheology-Control of Concrete for Digital Fabrication:
    Potential Admixtures and Cement-Chemistry
  10. Nematollahi Behzad, Xia Ming, Sanjayan Jay (2017-07)
    Current Progress of 3D Concrete Printing Technologies
  11. Rael Ronald, Fratello Virginia (2011-10)
    Developing Concrete Polymer Building Components for 3D Printing
  12. Roussel Nicolas (2018-05)
    Rheological Requirements for Printable Concretes
  13. Sanjayan Jay, Nematollahi Behzad (2019-02)
    3D Concrete Printing for Construction Applications
  14. Schutter Geert, Lesage Karel, Mechtcherine Viktor, Nerella Venkatesh et al. (2018-08)
    Vision of 3D Printing with Concrete:
    Technical, Economic and Environmental Potentials
  15. Wangler Timothy, Lloret-Fritschi Ena, Reiter Lex, Hack Norman et al. (2016-10)
    Digital Concrete:
    Opportunities and Challenges
  16. Wu Peng, Wang Jun, Wang Xiangyu (2016-04)
    A Critical Review of the Use of 3D Printing in the Construction Industry

23 Citations

  1. Hasan Md, Xu Jie, Uddin Md (2025-11)
    A Critical Review of 3D Printed Fiber-Based Geopolymer Concrete:
    Fresh Properties, Mechanical Performance, and Current Limitations
  2. Tang Jiyu, Wang Zhihang, Gao Danying, Yang Lin et al. (2025-11)
    Research Progress on 3D Printed Geopolymer Concrete
  3. Mishra Jyotirmoy, Babafemi Adewumi, Combrinck Riaan (2025-04)
    Limitations and Research Priorities in 3D-Printed Geopolymer Concrete:
    A Perspective Contribution
  4. Khan Mirza, Ahmed Aayzaz, Ali Tariq, Qureshi Muhammad et al. (2024-12)
    Comprehensive Review of 3D Printed Concrete, Life Cycle Assessment, AI and ML Models:
    Materials, Engineered Properties and Techniques for Additive Manufacturing
  5. Cai Jianguo, Wang Jingsong, Zhang Qian, Du Caixia et al. (2024-10)
    State of the Art of Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Concrete
  6. Perrot Arnaud, Jacquet Yohan, Caron Jean-François, Mesnil Romain et al. (2024-08)
    Snapshot on 3D Printing with Alternative Binders and Materials:
    Earth, Geopolymers, Gypsum and Low-Carbon Concrete
  7. Krishna R., Rehman Asif, Mishra Jyotirmoy, Saha Suman et al. (2024-06)
    Additive Manufacturing of Geopolymer Composites for Sustainable Construction:
    Critical Factors, Advancements, Challenges, and Future Directions
  8. Zaid Osama, Ouni Mohamed (2024-04)
    Advancements in 3D Printing of Cementitious Materials:
    A Review of Mineral Additives, Properties, and Systematic Developments
  9. Hassan Habibelrahman, Rodriguez-Ubinas Edwin, Tamimi Adil, Trepci Esra et al. (2024-04)
    Towards Innovative and Sustainable Buildings:
    A Comprehensive Review of 3D Printing in Construction
  10. Wang Xiaonan, Li Wengui, Guo Yipu, Kashani Alireza et al. (2024-02)
    Concrete 3D Printing Technology in Sustainable Construction:
    A Review on Raw Materials, Concrete Types and Performances
  11. Moraes Maria, Nagata Ester, Duran Afonso, Rossignolo João (2024-02)
    Alkali-Activated Materials Applied in 3D Printing Construction:
    A Review
  12. Panda Biranchi, Shakor Pshtiwan, Laghi Vittoria (2023-12)
    Powder-Bed Additive Manufacturing
  13. Mai (née Dressler) Inka, Herding Friedrich, Lowke Dirk (2023-12)
    Effect of Grain-Size and Layer-Thickness on Hardened State Properties in Selective Cement-Activation
  14. Tao Yaxin, Dai Xiaodi, Schutter Geert, Tittelboom Kim (2023-06)
    Set-on-Demand of Alkali-Activated Slag Mixture Using Twin-Pipe Pumping
  15. Noaimat Yazeed, Ghaffar Seyed, Chougan Mehdi, Kheetan Mazen (2022-12)
    A Review of 3D Printing Low-Carbon Concrete with One-Part Geopolymer:
    Engineering, Environmental and Economic Feasibility
  16. Peng Yiming, Unluer Cise (2022-12)
    Development of Alternative Cementitious Binders for 3D Printing Applications:
    A Critical Review of Progress, Advantages and Challenges
  17. Zhong Hui, Zhang Mingzhong (2022-02)
    3D Printing Geopolymers:
    A Review
  18. Amran Mugahed, Abdelgader Hakim, Onaizi Ali, Fediuk Roman et al. (2021-12)
    3D Printable Alkali-Activated Concretes for Building Applications:
    A Critical Review
  19. Ki Dongwon, Kang Shin, Park Kwang-Min (2021-07)
    Upcycling of Wastewater Sludge Incineration Ash as a 3D Printing Technology Resource
  20. Marchment Taylor, Sanjayan Jay (2021-04)
    Reinforcement Method for 3D Concrete Printing Using Paste-Coated Bar Penetrations
  21. Weger Daniel, Gehlen Christoph (2021-01)
    Particle-Bed Binding by Selective Paste-Intrusion:
    Strength and Durability of Printed Fine-Grain Concrete Members
  22. Kruger Jacques, Zijl Gideon (2020-10)
    A Compendious Review on Lack-of-Fusion in Digital Concrete Fabrication
  23. Lowke Dirk, Talke Daniel, Mai (née Dressler) Inka, Weger Daniel et al. (2020-05)
    Particle-Bed 3D Printing by Selective Cement-Activation:
    Applications, Material and Process Technology

BibTeX
@article{nema_xia_sanj.2019.PpMtISoPB3PGfDCA,
  author            = "Behzad Nematollahi and Ming Xia and Jay Gnananandan Sanjayan",
  title             = "Post-processing Methods to Improve Strength of Particle-Bed 3D Printed Geopolymer for Digital Construction Applications",
  doi               = "10.3389/fmats.2019.00160",
  year              = "2019",
  journal           = "Frontiers in Materials",
  volume            = "6",
}
Formatted Citation

B. Nematollahi, M. Xia and J. G. Sanjayan, “Post-processing Methods to Improve Strength of Particle-Bed 3D Printed Geopolymer for Digital Construction Applications”, Frontiers in Materials, vol. 6, 2019, doi: 10.3389/fmats.2019.00160.

Nematollahi, Behzad, Ming Xia, and Jay Gnananandan Sanjayan. “Post-processing Methods to Improve Strength of Particle-Bed 3D Printed Geopolymer for Digital Construction Applications”. Frontiers in Materials 6 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2019.00160.