Skip to content

Development and Optimisation of a Standardised Rheological Method for 3D Printing Cementitious Mixtures Using Rotational Rheometry: An Experimental and Statistical Approach (2026-01)

10.3390/buildings16020458

 Muñoz-Benavides Miguel,  Robayo-Salazar Rafael,  Gordillo-Suárez Marisol,  Mejía de Gutiérrez Ruby
Journal Article - Buildings, Vol. 16, Iss. 2, No. 458

Abstract

This study presents the development and optimisation of a standardised rheological test method based on rotational rheometry for the characterisation of cementitious mixtures designed for 3D printing. Tests were performed using a Discovery HR-20 rotational rheometer (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) equipped with a concentric-cylinder cup-and-paddle geometry. A high-early-strength Portland cement (ASTM C1157 Type HE) with a constant water-to-cement ratio (w/c) of 0.35 was employed. The methodological framework comprised five sequential stages: (i) assessment of the pre-conditioning effect; (ii) standardisation of the static shear test; (iii) optimisation of pre-conditioning parameters; (iv) standardisation of the dynamic shear test; and (v) evaluation of the influence of sample volume. Optimal conditions were determined as follows: for pre-conditioning, a shear rate of 50 s−1, holding time (Ht) of 30 s, and rest period of 180 s; for the static shear test, a shear rate range of 0.05–0.10 s−1 with a Ht of 60 s; for the dynamic shear test, a 30 s ramp up/down, maximum shear rate of 100 s−1, and Ht of 90 s. An optimal sample volume ranging between 150 and 175 mL was established. The proposed method represents a robust and reproducible experimental protocol for evaluating, comparing, and optimising the rheological behaviour of cementitious mixtures using rotational rheometry, providing a reliable tool for the formulation of mixtures tailored to additive manufacturing or 3D printing processes.

27 References

  1. Arunothayan Arun, Nematollahi Behzad, Khayat Kamal, Ramesh Akilesh et al. (2022-11)
    Rheological Characterization of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete for 3D Printing
  2. Bayat Hamid, Kashani Alireza (2023-09)
    Analysis of Rheological Properties and Printability of a 3D Printing Mortar Containing Silica-Fume, Hydrated Lime, and Blast-Furnace-Slag
  3. Chen Mingxu, Li Laibo, Wang Jiaao, Huang Yongbo et al. (2019-10)
    Rheological Parameters and Building Time of 3D Printing Sulphoaluminate-Cement-Paste Modified by Retarder and Diatomite
  4. Chen Mingxu, Li Haisheng, Yang Lei, Wang Shoude et al. (2022-03)
    Rheology and Shape-Stability-Control of 3D Printed Calcium-Sulphoaluminate-Cement Composites Containing Paper-Milling-Sludge
  5. Chen Mingxu, Liu Bo, Li Laibo, Cao Lidong et al. (2020-01)
    Rheological Parameters, Thixotropy and Creep of 3D Printed Calcium-Sulfoaluminate-Cement Composites Modified by Bentonite
  6. Harbouz Ilhame, Rozière Emmanuel, Yahia Ammar, Loukili Ahmed (2022-02)
    Printability-Assessment of Cement-Based Materials Based on Rheology, Hydration Kinetics, and Viscoelastic Properties
  7. Ji Xuping, Pan Tinghong, Liu Xingyao, Zhao Wenhao et al. (2023-09)
    Characterization of Thixotropic Properties of Fresh Cement‐Based Materials
  8. Kazemian Ali, Yuan Xiao, Cochran Evan, Khoshnevis Behrokh (2017-04)
    Cementitious Materials for Construction-Scale 3D Printing:
    Laboratory Testing of Fresh Printing Mixture
  9. Khan Mohammad, Sanchez Florence, Zhou Hongyu (2020-04)
    3D Printing of Concrete:
    Beyond Horizons
  10. Kristombu Baduge Shanaka, Navaratnam Satheeskumar, Zidan Yousef, McCormack Tom et al. (2021-01)
    Improving Performance of Additive Manufactured Concrete:
    A Review on Material Mix-Design, Processing, Inter-Layer Bonding, and Reinforcing-Methods
  11. Lee Keon-Woo, Lee Hojae, Choi Myoungsung (2022-07)
    Correlation Between Thixotropic Behavior and Buildability for 3D Concrete Printing
  12. Li Mingyang, Liu Zhixin, Ho Jin, Wong Teck (2023-08)
    Experimental Investigation of Fresh and Time-Dependent Rheological Properties of 3D Printed Cementitious Material
  13. Liu Zhixin, Li Mingyang, Weng Yiwei, Wong Teck et al. (2018-12)
    Mixture-Design-Approach to Optimize the Rheological Properties of the Material Used in 3D Cementitious Material-Printing
  14. Manikandan Karthick, Wi Kwangwoo, Zhang Xiao, Wang Kejin et al. (2020-03)
    Characterizing Cement Mixtures for Concrete 3D Printing
  15. Marchon Delphine, Kawashima Shiho, Bessaies-Bey Hela, Mantellato Sara et al. (2018-05)
    Hydration- and Rheology-Control of Concrete for Digital Fabrication:
    Potential Admixtures and Cement-Chemistry
  16. Perrot Arnaud, Rangeard Damien, Pierre Alexandre (2015-02)
    Structural Build-Up of Cement-Based Materials Used for 3D Printing-Extrusion-Techniques
  17. Qian Ye, Kawashima Shiho (2016-09)
    Use of Creep Recovery Protocol to Measure Static Yield-Stress and Structural Rebuilding of Fresh Cement-Pastes
  18. Rahman Mahfuzur, Rawat Sanket, Yang Chunhui, Mahil Ahmed et al. (2024-05)
    A Comprehensive Review on Fresh and Rheological Properties of 3D Printable Cementitious Composites
  19. Ravichandran Darssni, Giridhar Greeshma, Ramamurthy Vignesh, Prem Prabhat (2023-03)
    Influence of Test-Protocol on Determining the Rheological Properties of Cement-Pastes-Mixtures for Concrete 3D Printing
  20. Rehman Atta, Kim Jung-Hoon (2021-07)
    3D Concrete Printing:
    A Systematic Review of Rheology, Mix Designs, Mechanical, Microstructural, and Durability Characteristics
  21. Robayo-Salazar Rafael, Muñoz Miguel, Vargas Armando, Gutiérrez Ruby (2024-08)
    Effects of Incorporating Bentonite, Metakaolin, Microsilica, and Calcium-Carbonate on the Rheological Properties of Portland-Cement-Based 3D Printing Inks
  22. Souza Marcelo, Ferreira Igor, Moraes Elisângela, Senff Luciano et al. (2020-09)
    3D Printed Concrete for Large-Scale Buildings:
    An Overview of Rheology, Printing Parameters, Chemical Admixtures, Reinforcements, and Economic and Environmental Prospects
  23. Souza Marcelo, Ferreira Igor, Moraes Elisângela, Senff Luciano et al. (2021-11)
    Role of Chemical Admixtures on 3D Printed Portland Cement:
    Assessing Rheology and Buildability
  24. Tinoco Matheus, Gouvêa Lucas, Cássia Magalhães Martins Karenn, Toledo Filho Romildo et al. (2022-12)
    The Use of Rice Husk Particles to Adjust the Rheological Properties of 3D Printable Cementitious Composites Through Water Sorption
  25. Varela Hugo, Barluenga Gonzalo, Perrot Arnaud (2023-07)
    Extrusion and Structural Build-Up of 3D Printing Cement-Pastes with Fly-Ash, Nano-Clay and VMAs
  26. Zhang Yu, Zhang Yunsheng, She Wei, Yang Lin et al. (2019-01)
    Rheological and Hardened Properties of the High-Thixotropy 3D Printing Concrete
  27. Zhao Zhihui, Chen Mingxu, Jin Yuan, Lu Lingchao et al. (2022-05)
    Rheology-Control Towards 3D Printed Magnesium-Potassium-Phosphate-Cement Composites

0 Citations

BibTeX
@article{muno_roba_gord_meji.2026.DaOoaSRMf3PCMURRAEaSA,
  author            = "Miguel Angel Muñoz-Benavides and Rafael Andres Robayo-Salazar and Marisol Gordillo-Suárez and Ruby Mejía de Gutiérrez",
  title             = "Development and Optimisation of a Standardised Rheological Method for 3D Printing Cementitious Mixtures Using Rotational Rheometry: An Experimental and Statistical Approach",
  doi               = "10.3390/buildings16020458",
  year              = "2026",
  journal           = "Buildings",
  volume            = "16",
  number            = "2",
  pages             = "458",
}
Formatted Citation

M. A. Muñoz-Benavides, R. A. Robayo-Salazar, M. Gordillo-Suárez and R. M. de Gutiérrez, “Development and Optimisation of a Standardised Rheological Method for 3D Printing Cementitious Mixtures Using Rotational Rheometry: An Experimental and Statistical Approach”, Buildings, vol. 16, no. 2, p. 458, 2026, doi: 10.3390/buildings16020458.

Muñoz-Benavides, Miguel Angel, Rafael Andres Robayo-Salazar, Marisol Gordillo-Suárez, and Ruby Mejía de Gutiérrez. “Development and Optimisation of a Standardised Rheological Method for 3D Printing Cementitious Mixtures Using Rotational Rheometry: An Experimental and Statistical Approach”. Buildings 16, no. 2 (2026): 458. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16020458.