Skip to content

Environmental Assessment of Multi-Functional Building Elements Constructed with Digital Fabrication Techniques (2018-11)

10.1007/s11367-018-1563-4

 Agustí-Juan Isolda,  Jipa Mihail-Andrei,  Habert Guillaume
Journal Article - The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 24, Iss. 6, pp. 1027-1039

Abstract

Digital fabrication is revolutionizing architecture, enabling the construction of complex and multi-functional building elements. Multi-functionality is often achieved through material reduction strategies such as functional or material hybridization. However, these design strategies may increase environmental impacts over the life cycle. The integration offunctions may hinder the maintenance and shorten the service life. Moreover, once a building element has reached the end oflife, hybrid materials may influence negatively its recycling capacity. Consequently, the aimofthis paper is to analyze the influence ofmulti-functionality in the environmental performance oftwo digitally fabricated architectural elements: The Sequential Roofand Concrete-Sandstone Composite Slab and to compare them with existing standard elements. A method based on the life-cycle assessment (LCA) framework is applied for the evaluation of the environmental implications ofmulti-functionality in digital fabrication. The evaluation consists ofthe comparison ofembodied impacts between a multi-functional building element constructed with digital fabrication techniques and a conventional one, both with the same building functions. Specifically, the method considers the lifetime uncertainty caused by multi-functionality by considering two alternative service life scenarios during the evaluation of the digitally fabricated building element. The study is extended with a sensitivity analysis to evaluate the additional environmental implications during end-of-life processing derived from the use of hybrid materials to achieve multi-functionality in architecture. The evaluation of two case studies of digitally fabricated architecture indicates that their environmental impacts are very sensitive to the duration oftheir service life. Considering production and life span phases, multi-functional building elements should have a minimum service life of 30 years to bring environmental benefits over conventional construction. Furthermore, the case study of Concrete-Sandstone Composite Slab shows that using hybrid materials to achieve multifunctionality carries important environmental consequences at the end oflife, such as the emission ofair pollutants during recycling. Conclusions The results from the case studies allow the identification ofkey environmental criteria to consider during the design of digitally fabricated building elements. Multi-functionality provides material efficiency during production, but design adaptability must be a priority to avoid a decrease in their environmental performance. Moreover, the high environmental impacts caused by end-of-life processing should be compensated during design.

6 References

  1. Agustí-Juan Isolda, Habert Guillaume (2016-11)
    Environmental Design Guidelines for Digital Fabrication
  2. Agustí-Juan Isolda, Müller Florian, Hack Norman, Wangler Timothy et al. (2017-04)
    Potential Benefits of Digital Fabrication for Complex Structures:
    Environmental Assessment of a Robotically Fabricated Concrete Wall
  3. Gosselin Clément, Duballet Romain, Roux Philippe, Gaudillière-Jami Nadja et al. (2016-03)
    Large-Scale 3D Printing of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete:
    A New Processing Route for Architects and Builders
  4. Jipa Mihail-Andrei, Bernhard Mathias, Meibodi Mania, Dillenburger Benjamin (2016-11)
    3D Printed Stay-in-Place Formwork for Topologically Optimized Concrete Slabs
  5. Labonnote Nathalie, Rønnquist Anders, Manum Bendik, Rüther Petra (2016-09)
    Additive Construction:
    State of the Art, Challenges and Opportunities
  6. Schutter Geert, Lesage Karel, Mechtcherine Viktor, Nerella Venkatesh et al. (2018-08)
    Vision of 3D Printing with Concrete:
    Technical, Economic and Environmental Potentials

17 Citations

  1. Banihashemi Saeed, Akbarnezhad Ali, Sheikhkhoshkar Moslem, Haouzi Hind et al. (2025-08)
    3D Printing in Construction:
    Sustainable Technology for Building Industry
  2. Assunção Badan Julie, Chadha Kunaljit, Vasey Lauren, Brumaud Coralie et al. (2024-06)
    Contribution of Production Processes in Environmental Impact of Low-Carbon Materials Made by Additive Manufacturing
  3. Fleckenstein Julia, Knychalla Bruno, Briels David, Baghdadi Abtin et al. (2024-04)
    BREUER × AM:
    Functional Hybridisation in Concrete Building Envelope Elements through Additive Manufacturing
  4. Fleckenstein Julia, Bertagna Federico, Piccioni Valeria, Fechner Mareen et al. (2023-09)
    Revisiting Breuer Through Additive Manufacturing:
    Passive Solar-Control-Design-Strategies for Bespoke Concrete Building Envelope Elements
  5. Singh Narinder, Colangelo Francesco, Farina Ilenia (2023-06)
    Sustainable Non-Conventional Concrete 3D Printing:
    A Review
  6. Graser Konrad, Walzer Alexander, Hunhevicz Jens, Jähne René et al. (2023-06)
    Qualitative Technology Evaluation of Digital Fabrication with Concrete:
    Conceptual Framework and Scoreboard
  7. Khosravani Mohammad, Haghighi Azadeh (2022-08)
    Large-Scale Automated Additive Construction:
    Overview, Robotic Solutions, Sustainability, and Future Prospect
  8. Jipa Mihail-Andrei, Reiter Lex, Flatt Robert, Dillenburger Benjamin (2022-07)
    Environmental Stress Cracking of 3D Printed Polymers Exposed to Concrete
  9. Bedarf Patrick, Szabó Anna, Zanini Michele, Heusi Alex et al. (2022-04)
    Robotic 3D Printing of Mineral Foam for a Lightweight Composite Concrete Slab
  10. Tinoco Matheus, Mendonça Érica, Fernandez Letízia, Caldas Lucas et al. (2022-04)
    Life Cycle Assessment and Environmental Sustainability of Cementitious Materials for 3D Concrete Printing:
    A Systematic Literature Review
  11. Jipa Mihail-Andrei, Dillenburger Benjamin (2022-04)
    3D Printed Formwork for Concrete:
    State of the Art, Opportunities, Challenges, and Applications
  12. Lowke Dirk, Mai (née Dressler) Inka, Keita Emmanuel, Perrot Arnaud et al. (2022-02)
    Material-Process Interactions in Particle-Bed 3D Printing and the Underlying Physics
  13. Graser Konrad, Kahlert Aniko, Hall Daniel (2021-10)
    DFAB HOUSE:
    Implications of a Building-Scale Demonstrator for Adoption of Digital Fabrication in AEC
  14. Voney Vera, Odaglia Pietro, Brumaud Coralie, Dillenburger Benjamin et al. (2021-02)
    From Casting to 3D Printing Geopolymers:
    A Proof of Concept
  15. Odaglia Pietro, Voney Vera, Dillenburger Benjamin, Habert Guillaume (2020-07)
    Advances in Binder-Jet 3D Printing of Non-Cementitious Materials
  16. Reiter Lex, Wangler Timothy, Anton Ana-Maria, Flatt Robert (2020-05)
    Setting-on-Demand for Digital Concrete:
    Principles, Measurements, Chemistry, Validation
  17. Wangler Timothy, Roussel Nicolas, Bos Freek, Salet Theo et al. (2019-06)
    Digital Concrete:
    A Review

BibTeX
@article{agus_jipa_habe.2019.EAoMFBECwDFT,
  author            = "Isolda Agustí-Juan and Mihail-Andrei Jipa and Guillaume Habert",
  title             = "Environmental Assessment of Multi-Functional Building Elements Constructed with Digital Fabrication Techniques",
  doi               = "10.1007/s11367-018-1563-4",
  year              = "2019",
  journal           = "The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment",
  volume            = "24",
  number            = "6",
  pages             = "1027--1039",
}
Formatted Citation

I. Agustí-Juan, M.-A. Jipa and G. Habert, “Environmental Assessment of Multi-Functional Building Elements Constructed with Digital Fabrication Techniques”, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1027–1039, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11367-018-1563-4.

Agustí-Juan, Isolda, Mihail-Andrei Jipa, and Guillaume Habert. “Environmental Assessment of Multi-Functional Building Elements Constructed with Digital Fabrication Techniques”. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 24, no. 6 (2019): 1027–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1563-4.