Skip to content

Comparison of Rheology Measurement Techniques Used in 3D Concrete Printing Applications (2019-12)

10.1007/978-981-15-7222-7_23

 Jayathilakage Roshan,  Sanjayan Jay,  Rajeev Pathmanathan
Contribution - Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction Management, pp. 261-273

Abstract

3D Concrete Printing (3DCP) is a novel and emerging construction technique to build using digital technologies and additive manufacturing concepts. Some main advantages of 3DCP are reduced formwork wastage, the capability of constructing complex geometric shapes, higher precision, shorter construction time and increased safety. In the particular method, the structure is built layer by layer by extruding the material through a nozzle. Initially, the material should be pumped and extruded with considerable fluidity and workability. Immediately after the extrusion, the extruded layers should have enough strength and stiffness to retain the desired shape. Therefore, controlling the rheology of the material is of high importance in 3DCP. Due to the higher stiffness, and higher time and rate-dependent material behavior (thixotropic behavior) compared to the conventional concrete, conventional rheology measurement techniques have many limitations when used for 3DCPmaterial. Therefore, non-conventional (direct shear test, orifice extrusion, vane shear test), as well as conventional rheology measurement techniques (rotational rheometer and slump test), were conducted to compare the results and to characterize the rheological parameters. The rheological parameters (i.e. yield stress, viscosity, and thixotropic build rate) of concrete were measured for three different mixes. The achieved values were compared to decide the most suitable and reliable test method. The pros and cons of each test method also were discussed. The achieved yield stress values are different according to the test method used. However, a similar trend can be seen in all the testing methods. Rotational rheometer gives the lowest yield stress values, while an orifice extrusion test gives the highest yield stress values. Finally, it can be predicted that the extrusion-based testing methods such as orifice extrusion technique used in the current study give reliable results on yield stress and viscosity measurements due to the similarities between the measurement technique and the actual 3D printing extrusion process.

5 References

  1. Jayathilakage Roshan, Sanjayan Jay, Rajeev Pathmanathan (2019-01)
    Direct-Shear-Test for the Assessment of Rheological Parameters of Concrete for 3D Printing Applications
  2. Le Thanh, Austin Simon, Lim Sungwoo, Buswell Richard et al. (2012-01)
    Mix-Design and Fresh Properties for High-Performance Printing Concrete
  3. Lim Sungwoo, Buswell Richard, Le Thanh, Austin Simon et al. (2011-07)
    Developments in Construction-Scale Additive Manufacturing Processes
  4. Perrot Arnaud, Rangeard Damien, Pierre Alexandre (2015-02)
    Structural Build-Up of Cement-Based Materials Used for 3D Printing-Extrusion-Techniques
  5. Zhou Xiangming, Li Zongjin, Fan Mizi, Chen Huapeng (2013-01)
    Rheology of Semi-Solid Fresh Cement-Pastes and Mortars in Orifice-Extrusion

15 Citations

  1. Gil-Lopez Tomas, Amirfiroozkoohi Alireza, Valiente López María, Verdu-Vazquez Maria (2026-01)
    The Impact of 3D Printing on Mortar Strength and Flexibility:
    A Comparative Analysis of Conventional and Additive Manufacturing Techniques
  2. Mishra Sanjeet, Snehal K., Das B., Chandrasekaran Rajasekaran et al. (2025-05)
    From Printing to Performance:
    A Review on 3D Concrete Printing Processes, Materials, and Life Cycle Assessment
  3. Sando Mona, Stephan Dietmar (2025-02)
    The Role of Mixing Sequence in Shaping the 3D-Printability of Geopolymers
  4. Khan Mirza, Ahmed Aayzaz, Ali Tariq, Qureshi Muhammad et al. (2024-12)
    Comprehensive Review of 3D Printed Concrete, Life Cycle Assessment, AI and ML Models:
    Materials, Engineered Properties and Techniques for Additive Manufacturing
  5. Bao Ta, Yeakleang Muy, Abdelouhab Sandra, Courard Luc (2024-10)
    Testing Mortars for 3D Printing:
    Correlation with Rheological Behavior
  6. Zhang Nan, Sanjayan Jay (2024-07)
    Pumping-Less 3D Concrete Printing Using Quick Nozzle Mixing
  7. Zafar Muhammad, Bakhshi Amir, Hojati Maryam (2023-10)
    Printability and Shape Fidelity Evaluation of Self-Reinforced Engineered Cementitious Composites
  8. Zhang Nan, Sanjayan Jay (2023-08)
    Surfactants to Enable Quick Nozzle Mixing in 3D Concrete Printing
  9. Razzaghian Ghadikolaee Mehrdad, Cerro-Prada Elena, Pan Zhu, Korayem Asghar (2023-04)
    Nanomaterials as Promising Additives for High-Performance 3D Printed Concrete:
    A Critical Review
  10. Jayathilakage Roshan, Rajeev Pathmanathan, Sanjayan Jay (2022-08)
    Rheometry for Concrete 3D Printing:
    A Review and an Experimental Comparison
  11. Mukhametrakhimov Rustem, Ziganshina Liliya (2022-04)
    Improvement of Technology and Quality-Control of 3DCP
  12. Zhang Nan, Xia Ming, Sanjayan Jay (2021-10)
    Short-Duration Near-Nozzle Mixing for 3D Concrete Printing
  13. Rehman Atta, Kim Jung-Hoon (2021-07)
    3D Concrete Printing:
    A Systematic Review of Rheology, Mix Designs, Mechanical, Microstructural, and Durability Characteristics
  14. Jayathilakage Roshan, Rajeev Pathmanathan, Sanjayan Jay (2021-05)
    Extrusion Rheometer for 3D Concrete Printing
  15. Sanjayan Jay, Jayathilakage Roshan, Rajeev Pathmanathan (2020-11)
    Vibration-Induced Active Rheology-Control for 3D Concrete Printing

BibTeX
@inproceedings{jaya_sanj_raje.2021.CoRMTUi3CPA,
  author            = "Roshan I. Jayathilakage and Jay Gnananandan Sanjayan and Pathmanathan Rajeev",
  title             = "Comparison of Rheology Measurement Techniques Used in 3D Concrete Printing Applications",
  doi               = "10.1007/978-981-15-7222-7_23",
  year              = "2021",
  volume            = "94",
  pages             = "261--273",
  booktitle         = "Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction Management",
  editor            = "Ranjith Dissanayake and Priyan Mendis and Kolita Weerasekera and Sudhira de Silva and Shiromal Fernando",
}
Formatted Citation

R. I. Jayathilakage, J. G. Sanjayan and P. Rajeev, “Comparison of Rheology Measurement Techniques Used in 3D Concrete Printing Applications”, in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction Management, 2021, vol. 94, pp. 261–273. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-7222-7_23.

Jayathilakage, Roshan I., Jay Gnananandan Sanjayan, and Pathmanathan Rajeev. “Comparison of Rheology Measurement Techniques Used in 3D Concrete Printing Applications”. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction Management, edited by Ranjith Dissanayake, Priyan Mendis, Kolita Weerasekera, Sudhira de Silva, and Shiromal Fernando, 94:261–73, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7222-7_23.