Skip to content

Overcoming Environmental Stress-Cracking of FDM 3D Printed Formwork for Counter-Pressure Casting of Concrete (2022-04)

10.1089/3dp.2021.0006

 Ruffray Nicolas,  Reiter Lex,  Flatt Robert
Journal Article - 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing, Vol. 9, Iss. 2, pp. 122-131

Abstract

The rapid growth of interest toward concrete digital fabrication reflects the current aspiration for better, smarter, faster, and greener construction means. Among a broad variety of techniques developed by our community, digital casting presents clear advantages regarding dimensional precision, geometrical freedom, and surface finish of the produced elements. In contrast to robotic slip forming, the usage of digitally fabricated formworks requires simpler equipment. It, however, calls for easily shaped formworks, typically best three-dimensional (3D) printed, for example, by fused deposition modeling. While such molds can be easily fabricated with a wide range of commercially off-the-shelf available 3D printers, a shortcoming is the susceptibility of many polymers to environmental stress cracking, particularly when in contact with high pH solutions typical for cementitious materials. This article confirms the problem posed by this type of environmental stress cracking and presents two very effective means of circumventing it: A silicone coating and cyclic olefin copolymer. Apart from this, in the specific case of counterpressure casting (CPC), hydrostatic pressure must be resisted by a powder bed surrounding the formwork. The efficiency of such beds is examined and a particular mixture of sand and lead is shown to be particularly effective, provided its density is regulated to balance stress principles derived from soil mechanics. Presented applications include the successful CPC of thin prismatic formworks with a concrete height up to 3 m as representative of typical interfloor load-bearing elements. The combination of counterpressure and stress control is shown to be essential for such achievement, highlighting the potential of this approach as a viable member of the concrete digital casting family.

26 References

  1. Asprone Domenico, Menna Costantino, Bos Freek, Salet Theo et al. (2018-06)
    Rethinking Reinforcement for Digital Fabrication with Concrete
  2. Burger Joris, Lloret-Fritschi Ena, Scotto Fabio, Demoulin Thibault et al. (2020-04)
    Eggshell:
    Ultra-Thin Three-Dimensional Printed Formwork for Concrete Structures
  3. Buswell Richard, Silva Wilson, Jones Scott, Dirrenberger Justin (2018-06)
    3D Printing Using Concrete-Extrusion:
    A Roadmap for Research
  4. Cesaretti Giovanni, Dini Enrico, Kestelier Xavier, Colla Valentina et al. (2013-08)
    Building Components for an Outpost on the Lunar Soil by Means of a Novel 3D Printing Technology
  5. Costa Eduardo, Shepherd Paul, Orr John, Ibell Tim et al. (2020-07)
    Automating Concrete Construction:
    Digital Design of Non-Prismatic Reinforced Concrete Beams
  6. Dörfler Kathrin, Hack Norman, Sandy Timothy, Giftthaler Markus et al. (2019-09)
    Mobile Robotic Fabrication Beyond Factory Conditions:
    Case Study Mesh Mould Wall of the DFAB HOUSE
  7. Geneidy Omar, Kumarji Sujay, Dubor Alexandre, Sollazzo Aldo (2020-07)
    Simultaneous Reinforcement of Concrete While 3D Printing
  8. Hack Norman, Kloft Harald (2020-07)
    Shotcrete 3D Printing Technology for the Fabrication of Slender Fully Reinforced Freeform Concrete Elements with High Surface Quality:
    A Real-Scale Demonstrator
  9. Hack Norman, Lauer Willi (2014-04)
    Mesh Mould:
    Robotically Fabricated Spatial Meshes as Reinforced Concrete Formwork
  10. Hass Lauri, Bos Freek (2020-07)
    Bending and Pull-Out Tests on a Novel Screw Type Reinforcement for Extrusion-Based 3D Printed Concrete
  11. Khoshnevis Behrokh (2003-11)
    Automated Construction by Contour Crafting:
    Related Robotics and Information Technologies
  12. Lindemann Hendrik, Gerbers Roman, Ibrahim Serhat, Dietrich Franz et al. (2018-09)
    Development of a Shotcrete 3D Printing (SC3DP) Technology for Additive Manufacturing of Reinforced Freeform Concrete Structures
  13. Lloret-Fritschi Ena, Scotto Fabio, Gramazio Fabio, Kohler Matthias et al. (2018-09)
    Challenges of Real-Scale Production with Smart Dynamic Casting
  14. Lloret-Fritschi Ena, Wangler Timothy, Gebhard Lukas, Mata-Falcón Jaime et al. (2020-05)
    From Smart Dynamic Casting to a Growing Family of Digital Casting Systems
  15. Lowke Dirk, Dini Enrico, Perrot Arnaud, Weger Daniel et al. (2018-07)
    Particle-Bed 3D Printing in Concrete Construction:
    Possibilities and Challenges
  16. Mai (née Dressler) Inka, Freund Niklas, Lowke Dirk (2020-07)
    Control of Strand Properties Produced with Shotcrete 3D Printing by Accelerator Dosage and Process Parameters
  17. Marchment Taylor, Sanjayan Jay (2020-07)
    Penetration Reinforcing Method for 3D Concrete Printing
  18. Mechtcherine Viktor, Nerella Venkatesh, Ogura Hiroki, Grafe Jasmin et al. (2018-09)
    Alternative Reinforcements for Digital Concrete Construction
  19. Perrot Arnaud, Rangeard Damien, Pierre Alexandre (2015-02)
    Structural Build-Up of Cement-Based Materials Used for 3D Printing-Extrusion-Techniques
  20. Reiter Lex, Wangler Timothy, Anton Ana-Maria, Flatt Robert (2020-05)
    Setting-on-Demand for Digital Concrete:
    Principles, Measurements, Chemistry, Validation
  21. Szabó Anna, Lloret-Fritschi Ena, Reiter Lex, Gramazio Fabio et al. (2019-09)
    Revisiting Folded Forms with Digital Fabrication
  22. Szabó Anna, Reiter Lex, Lloret-Fritschi Ena, Gramazio Fabio et al. (2018-09)
    Adapting Smart Dynamic Casting to Thin-Folded Geometries
  23. Szabó Anna, Reiter Lex, Lloret-Fritschi Ena, Gramazio Fabio et al. (2020-04)
    Mastering Yield-Stress-Evolution and Formwork-Friction for Smart Dynamic Casting
  24. Szabó Anna, Reiter Lex, Lloret-Fritschi Ena, Wangler Timothy et al. (2020-07)
    ACDC:
    The Admixture-Controlled Digital Casting and Its Application to Thin-Folded Concrete Structures
  25. Wangler Timothy, Lloret-Fritschi Ena, Reiter Lex, Hack Norman et al. (2016-10)
    Digital Concrete:
    Opportunities and Challenges
  26. Wangler Timothy, Roussel Nicolas, Bos Freek, Salet Theo et al. (2019-06)
    Digital Concrete:
    A Review

5 Citations

  1. Andreou Vasilis, Kontovourkis Odysseas (2024-09)
    Formwork-Optimization for Complex 3D Concrete Printing:
    A Unified Theoretical, Digital, and Experimental Framework
  2. Wangler Timothy, Vangen Kathrina, Burger Joris, Flatt Robert (2024-05)
    Digital Fabrication Material-Processing-Strategy for Bespoke Low-Clinker Mass-Concrete Components
  3. Burger Joris, Aejmelaeus-Lindström Johan, Gürel Şeyma, Niketić Filip et al. (2023-02)
    Eggshell Pavilion:
    A Reinforced Concrete Structure Fabricated Using Robotically 3D Printed Formwork
  4. Jipa Mihail-Andrei, Reiter Lex, Flatt Robert, Dillenburger Benjamin (2022-07)
    Environmental Stress Cracking of 3D Printed Polymers Exposed to Concrete
  5. Lloret-Fritschi Ena, Quadranti Elia, Scotto Fabio, Fuhrimann Lukas et al. (2022-05)
    Additive Digital Casting:
    From Lab to Industry

BibTeX
@article{ruff_reit_flat.2022.OESCoF3PFfCPCoC,
  author            = "Nicolas Ruffray and Lex Reiter and Robert Johann Flatt",
  title             = "Overcoming Environmental Stress-Cracking of FDM 3D Printed Formwork for Counter-Pressure Casting of Concrete",
  doi               = "10.1089/3dp.2021.0006",
  year              = "2022",
  journal           = "3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing",
  volume            = "9",
  number            = "2",
  pages             = "122--131",
}
Formatted Citation

N. Ruffray, L. Reiter and R. J. Flatt, “Overcoming Environmental Stress-Cracking of FDM 3D Printed Formwork for Counter-Pressure Casting of Concrete”, 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 122–131, 2022, doi: 10.1089/3dp.2021.0006.

Ruffray, Nicolas, Lex Reiter, and Robert Johann Flatt. “Overcoming Environmental Stress-Cracking of FDM 3D Printed Formwork for Counter-Pressure Casting of Concrete”. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing 9, no. 2 (2022): 122–31. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2021.0006.