Influence of Foaming Agents and Stabilizers on Porosity in 3D Printed Foamed Concrete (2025-02)¶

This study examines the pore structure and distribution in 3D printed and cast foamed concrete using protein-based and synthetic foaming agents alongside various stabilizing additives. In 3D printed samples, pores are irregular and flattened due to mechanical forces during printing, whereas cast samples display uniform, spherical pores from homogeneous foam distribution. Samples containing the CA stabilizer show higher apparent densities (up to 2.05 g/cm3 for printed samples), correlating with lower water absorption. Protein-based foaming agents (PS) produce smaller, more evenly distributed pores, while synthetic agents (AS) result in larger, less uniform pores. Stabilizers significantly influence pore characteristics: commercial stabilizers yield smaller, more uniform pores, while recycled industrial oil (UO) leads to larger, more variable pores. Proteinbased agents improve structural stability and reduce water absorption through uniform pore distributions, while synthetic agents lower density and increase water absorption. The highest sorption values were observed in samples with AS without stabilizer (1.7 kg/m2h½) and AS and UO (1.6 kg/m2h½) in a vertical orientation, with the horizontal orientation of sample AS and UO achieving a peak value of 2.0 kg/m2h½. Moreover, stabilization using UO resulted in higher sorption coefficients than stabilization with CA. High porosity in M1 resulted in low strength (0.2 MPa bending, 0.1 MPa perpendicular compression), while M5 showed superior performance (11.5 MPa perpendicular compression). PS-foamed samples (M4, M6) with uniform pores had the highest strengths, with M6 achieving 3.8 MPa bending and 10.3 MPa perpendicular compression. Perpendicular compression (M5: 11.5 MPa) was up to three times stronger than parallel compression due to weak interlayer bonds in 3D printing.