Skip to content

Sustainable Geometries (2025-12)

A Comparative Analysis of Thermal Performance in Uninsulated 3D Printed Concrete Wall Topologies

10.1007/978-981-95-1826-5_58

 Feliciano Renzo,  Barrera Natalia,  Lukyanenko Artyom,  Rangel Bárbara,  Cunha Jaime
Contribution - Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Construction, Energy, Environment and Sustainability, pp. 551-559

Abstract

3D printing has become a leading trend in research and development, playing a crucial role in advancing the Construction 4.0 industry. Aligning with future sustainability goals by increasing productivity and minimising material waste, it is seen as a promising solution for sustainable construction. Concrete, valued for its availability, strength, and adaptability, is a primary material in 3D printing worldwide. However, its high usage of cement-based material, whose production leads to significant CO2 emissions, drives up its environmental impact substantially. Enhancing the thermal efficiency of 3D printed concrete structures offers a pathway to mitigate this impact. Literature indicates that thermal optimisation can be achieved by modifying structural topology or geometry. This review paper examines thermal optimisation in uninsulated 3D printed concrete walls by comparing 13 topologies referenced in the literature. These configurations were compared based on their geometric properties such as wall thickness and void percentage, as well as their U-values, to identify the primary factors affecting their thermal performance. In the cases analysed, U-values ranged between 0.61 and 3.485 W/m2K. Among them, the diamond, cob, and double-rowed configurations—featuring smaller air cavities, longer heat path distances, and more branches and intermediate barriers—demonstrated the best thermal performances within their respective studies. While findings indicated that majority of the studied topologies might need additional insulation to comply with several European U-value standards for new building envelopes, optimising wall geometry should remain to be pursued to reduce dependence on additional insulation measures.

11 References

  1. Alhumayani Hashem, Gomaa Mohamed, Soebarto Veronica, Jabi Wassim (2020-06)
    Environmental Assessment of Large-Scale 3D Printing in Construction:
    A Comparative Study between Cob and Concrete
  2. Briels David, Kollmannsberger Stefan, Leithner Felicitas, Matthäus Carla et al. (2022-07)
    Thermal Optimization of Additively Manufactured Lightweight Concrete Wall Elements with Internal Cellular Structure through Simulations and Measurements
  3. Chamatete Kunda, Yalçınkaya Çağlar (2024-10)
    Numerical Assessment of Thermal Bridging Effects in 3D Printed Foam-Concrete Walls
  4. Kaszyńska Maria, Olczyk Norbert, Techman Mateusz, Skibicki Szymon et al. (2019-02)
    Thermal-Humidity Parameters of 3D Printed Wall
  5. Mohamed Rania, Mohamed Abdelaziz (2024-05)
    Exploring the Environmental Benefits of 3D Printing Technology in Concrete Construction:
    A Review
  6. Olsson Nils, Arica Emrah, Woods Ruth, Madrid Javier (2021-10)
    Industry 4.0 in a Project Context:
    Introducing 3D Printing in Construction Projects
  7. Pessoa Ana Sofia, Guimarães Ana, Lucas Sandra, Simões Nuno (2021-02)
    3D Printing in the Construction Industry:
    A Systematic Review of the Thermal Performance in Buildings
  8. Rubeis Tullio, Ciccozzi Annamaria, Giusti Letizia, Ambrosini Dario (2024-07)
    On the Use of 3D Printing to Enhance the Thermal Performance of Building Envelope:
    A Review
  9. Sovetova Meruyert, Kaiser Calautit John (2024-08)
    Thermal and Energy Efficiency in 3D Printed Buildings:
    Review of Geometric Design, Materials and Printing Processes
  10. Suntharalingam Thadshajini, Upasiri Irindu, Gatheeshgar Perampalam, Poologanathan Keerthan et al. (2021-09)
    Energy Performance of 3D Printed Concrete Walls:
    A Numerical Study
  11. Zahrani Abdullah, Alghamdi Abdulrahman, Basalah Ahmad (2022-12)
    Computational Optimization of 3D Printed Concrete Walls for Improved Building Thermal Performance

0 Citations

BibTeX
@inproceedings{feli_barr_luky_rang.2026.SG,
  author            = "Renzo Feliciano and Natalia Barrera and Artyom Lukyanenko and Bárbara Rangel and Jaime Augusto de Jesus Cunha",
  title             = "Sustainable Geometries: A Comparative Analysis of Thermal Performance in Uninsulated 3D Printed Concrete Wall Topologies",
  doi               = "10.1007/978-981-95-1826-5_58",
  year              = "2026",
  volume            = "744",
  pages             = "551--559",
  booktitle         = "Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Construction, Energy, Environment and Sustainability",
  editor            = "Umberto Berardi and Julieta António and Nuno Simões",
}
Formatted Citation

R. Feliciano, N. Barrera, A. Lukyanenko, B. Rangel and J. A. de Jesus Cunha, “Sustainable Geometries: A Comparative Analysis of Thermal Performance in Uninsulated 3D Printed Concrete Wall Topologies”, in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Construction, Energy, Environment and Sustainability, 2026, vol. 744, pp. 551–559. doi: 10.1007/978-981-95-1826-5_58.

Feliciano, Renzo, Natalia Barrera, Artyom Lukyanenko, Bárbara Rangel, and Jaime Augusto de Jesus Cunha. “Sustainable Geometries: A Comparative Analysis of Thermal Performance in Uninsulated 3D Printed Concrete Wall Topologies”. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Construction, Energy, Environment and Sustainability, edited by Umberto Berardi, Julieta António, and Nuno Simões, 744:551–59, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-95-1826-5_58.