Skip to content

Durability of 3D Printed Concrete (2024-09)

A Comparison of Extrusion 3D Printing, Shotcrete 3D Printing and Conventional Casting

10.1007/978-3-031-70031-6_33

 Böhler David,  Mai (née Dressler) Inka,  Lowke Dirk
Contribution - Proceedings of the 4th RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication, pp. 283-290

Abstract

With the increasing technological development of 3D concrete printing processes, there has been an increased focus on researching the durability of 3D printed concrete and how the processes compare to conventionally cast concrete. Conventionally produced concrete is considered to be isotropic in terms of its hardened concrete properties (e.g. density, porosity and durability). In 3D concrete printing, the layer-by-layer nature of the process may cause an inhomogeneous distribution of concrete properties. This study compares the durability characterized by the penetration behaviour of pollutants (gaseous CO2 and liquid NaCl solution) for three manufacturing techniques: (1) Extrusion 3D Printing, (2) Shotcrete 3D printing, and (3) conventional concrete casting. For this purpose, the specimens are produced under the same conditions (material composition, storage). The specimens are tested for carbonation (accelerated carbonation method) and chloride migration resistance (rapid chloride migration test). The resulting chloride and carbonation depths are analysed using a Matlab tool. The results show a higher chloride migration resistance of the SC3DP samples compared to the extruded and conventionally cast samples. In contrast, the extruded and conventionally cast samples show an increased resistance to carbonation. In general, it is found that the 3D printed samples exhibit a distinct inhomogeneous penetration behaviour of the pollutants; however, the location of the greatest penetration depths varies depending on the 3D printing processes. The highest penetration depths of extruded samples were achieved in the bulk, whereas it occurred in the interface region for SC3DP samples. The results indicate that the durability resistance and the penetration behaviour of harmful substances in 3D printed concrete are not only determined by the layer-by-layer application itself, but also by process-specific influences from the 3D printing process, such as pumping or spraying.

7 References

  1. Böhler David, Freund Niklas, Mai (née Dressler) Inka, Lowke Dirk (2023-12)
    Shotcrete 3D Printing:
    Effect of Material‐Process-Interaction on the Global and Local Material Density
  2. Flatt Robert, Wangler Timothy (2022-05)
    On Sustainability and Digital Fabrication with Concrete
  3. Freund Niklas, David Martin, Böhler David, Mai (née Dressler) Inka et al. (2023-12)
    Shotcrete 3D Printing:
    Interaction of Nozzle Geometry, Homogeneity and Hardened Concrete Properties
  4. Heever Marchant, Plessis Anton, Kruger Jacques, Zijl Gideon (2022-01)
    Evaluating the Effects of Porosity on the Mechanical Properties of Extrusion-Based 3D Printed Concrete
  5. Kloft Harald, Krauss Hans-Werner, Hack Norman, Herrmann Eric et al. (2020-05)
    Influence of Process Parameters on the Inter-Layer Bond Strength of Concrete Elements Additive Manufactured by Shotcrete 3D Printing
  6. Mohan Manu, Rahul Attupurathu, Schutter Geert, Tittelboom Kim (2020-10)
    Extrusion-Based Concrete 3D Printing from a Material Perspective:
    A State of the Art Review
  7. Putten Jolien, Deprez Maxim, Cnudde Veerle, Schutter Geert et al. (2019-09)
    Microstructural Characterization of 3D Printed Cementitious Materials

2 Citations

  1. Reis Rui, Aroso Francisca, Brandão Filipe, Camões Aires et al. (2026-01)
    A Systematic Review on the Durability of 3D-Printed Cementitious Materials:
    Insights and Research Challenges
  2. Zhang Yi, Lima Lucas, Böhler David, Arunothayan Arun et al. (2025-10)
    Durability Assessment of 3D Printed Cement-Based Materials:
    A RILEM TC 304-ADC Interlaboratory Study

BibTeX
@inproceedings{bohl_mai_lowk.2024.Do3PC,
  author            = "David Böhler and Inka Mai (née Dressler) and Dirk Lowke",
  title             = "Durability of 3D Printed Concrete: A Comparison of Extrusion 3D Printing, Shotcrete 3D Printing and Conventional Casting",
  doi               = "10.1007/978-3-031-70031-6_33",
  year              = "2024",
  volume            = "53",
  pages             = "283--290",
  booktitle         = "Proceedings of the 4th RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication",
  editor            = "Dirk Lowke and Niklas Freund and David Böhler and Friedrich Herding",
}
Formatted Citation

D. Böhler, I. M. (née Dressler) and D. Lowke, “Durability of 3D Printed Concrete: A Comparison of Extrusion 3D Printing, Shotcrete 3D Printing and Conventional Casting”, in Proceedings of the 4th RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication, 2024, vol. 53, pp. 283–290. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-70031-6_33.

Böhler, David, Inka Mai (née Dressler), and Dirk Lowke. “Durability of 3D Printed Concrete: A Comparison of Extrusion 3D Printing, Shotcrete 3D Printing and Conventional Casting”. In Proceedings of the 4th RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication, edited by Dirk Lowke, Niklas Freund, David Böhler, and Friedrich Herding, 53:283–90, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70031-6_33.