Blast Response of Additively Constructed Concrete (2024-09)¶
10.24355/dbbs.084-202408190920-0
Johnson Carol, Jordan Joseph, ,
Contribution - Supplementary Proceedings of the 4th RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication
Abstract
As the adoption of additive construction (AC) (ISO/ASTM 52939:2023) increases for building components and the threat of terrorist activity remains high, the need to evaluate the dynamic response of AC structural components to blast loads becomes important. Since 2014, the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (CERL) has researched the use of AC for expeditionary structures [1-4]. In 2023, ERDC began investigating the response of partially reinforced AC panels to airblast loads using the 2.4 m (8-ft.) compressed gas driven Blast Load Simulator (BLS) at the Geotechnical and Structures Laboratory (GSL) in Vicksburg, MS, USA. This limited research project follows previous BLS studies to determine if AC has any clear weaknesses that would exclude this construction method for structures potentially subjected to blast loads. One of the advantages of AC is the ability to construct unique complex wall geometries. Two shapes were selected for evaluation and additively constructed at CERL: the flat and chevron wall (Figure 1). Extrusion based AC was used with a concrete mixture of nominal maximum aggregate size of 9.5 mm meeting requirements outlined in Negrón-McFarlane et al. [4]. Three 2.2 m wide by 2 m tall samples of each wall with a slenderness ratio of 9 were selected for evaluation. The wall samples used in the evaluation were constructed with 34.5 MPa (5-ksi) concrete, horizontal ladders every 20.3 cm (8-in.) and fully grouted vertical Grade-60 rebar, similar to European Grade 420, on the outer edges of the specimen and at the center line. To ensure a one-way response, the panels were supported along the top and bottom and free to deform along the sides. Measured properties included center-span deflection and the reflected pressure and impulse.
¶
4 References
- Jagoda Jeneé, Diggs-McGee Brandy, Kreiger Megan, Schuldt Steven (2020-04)
The Viability and Simplicity of 3D Printed Construction:
A Military Case Study - Kreiger Eric, Diggs-McGee Brandy, Wood Tanner, MacAllister Bruce et al. (2020-07)
Field Considerations for Deploying Additive Construction - Kreiger Eric, Kreiger Megan, Case Michael (2019-04)
Development of the Construction Processes for Reinforced Additively Constructed Concrete - Negron-McFarlane Christian, Kreiger Eric, Barna Lynette, Stynoski Peter et al. (2024-04)
Development of In-Place Test-Methods for Evaluating Printable Concretes
0 Citations
BibTeX
@inproceedings{john_jord_krei_krei.2024.BRoACC,
author = "Carol F. Johnson and Joseph Jordan and Eric L. Kreiger and Megan A. Kreiger",
title = "Blast Response of Additively Constructed Concrete",
doi = "10.24355/dbbs.084-202408190920-0",
year = "2024",
booktitle = "Supplementary Proceedings of the 4th RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication",
editor = "Dirk Lowke and Niklas Freund and David Böhler and Friedrich Herding",
}
Formatted Citation
C. F. Johnson, J. Jordan, E. L. Kreiger and M. A. Kreiger, “Blast Response of Additively Constructed Concrete”, in Supplementary Proceedings of the 4th RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication, 2024. doi: 10.24355/dbbs.084-202408190920-0.
Johnson, Carol F., Joseph Jordan, Eric L. Kreiger, and Megan A. Kreiger. “Blast Response of Additively Constructed Concrete”. In Supplementary Proceedings of the 4th RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication, edited by Dirk Lowke, Niklas Freund, David Böhler, and Friedrich Herding, 2024. https://doi.org/10.24355/dbbs.084-202408190920-0.